Hri Institute for Southasian Research and Exchange

Hri Institute for Southasian Research and Exchange

  • Film Southasia
  • Himal Southasian
  • Hri Institute
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Initiatives
    • Gandharva
    • Archives
    • Love Legends
    • Elsewhere
  • Blog Contributors
    • Laxmi Murthy
    • Surabhi Pudasaini
    • Daljit Ami
    • Sohail Abid
  • Contact Us

Save the Mahasthangarh

Posted in Elsewhere by admin
Feb 13 2011
TrackBack Address.

Mahasthangarh, located in present day Bangladesh, is one of the most prominent ‘urban citadel site’ in South Asia. There are over hundred satellite sites in the form of mounds surrounding the main city fortified by a massive wall and rampart. It is identified as the Pundranagar, the ancient capital of Pundrabardhan. Several excavations have been conducted on various parts of this site. Continuous habitation from the early historic period to the colonial period has been detected. Archaeological stratigraphy from the Interim Report of the excavation conducted by the Bangladesh-France joint team has suggested, with the corroboration of the Radiocarbon dates,  that the earliest date goes back to the 4th-3rd century BCE. However, most of the area covered by the citadel is yet to be excavated. Besides, recent excavations at Vasu Bihara (a Buddhist monastery) and Bihar dhap (a mound) and Mazar area have revealed interesting cultural history in this part of undivided Bengal.

There is a Mazar of Saint Shah Sultan Mahisawar on one of the prominent locations of the southern fortification wall. Oral history and legends associate Mahisawar with Raja Parashuram. The narrative suggests that local Hindu king Parashuram was defeated by the saint. The narratives are different in the causes and consequences of the battle between the two, embodying possibly the rise of Islam in this part of Bengal. The recent event of destruction started on 27 November 2010 in the name of constructing a multistoried building beside the mazar. Digging of foundation trenches and destruction of precious archaeological remains were noted by the officials of Department of Archaeology. Many people acted immediately against these act of destruction. It is to be noted that, the destruction, illegal digging for looting valuable artefacts, for the collection of soil for even governmental developmental activities are very common in the Mahasthan area where site density is heavy in a wide area. Mention could be made of the Karmasrijan Project (Project to ensure employment) by the local Shibganj Upazila Parishad involved the digging of an important archaeological mound – Baro Tangra Dhap – in mid-2010 for the construction of a road.

On 7 December, Human Rights for Peace in Bangladesh submitted a writ petition to the High Court of Bangladesh alleging the violation of the constitution by the destruction. Preservation and protection of the National Cultural Heritage have been ensured in the constitution of Bangladesh and any kind of construction work threatening the protection has been prohibited. High Court Bench promptly ruled for the immediate stop of the destruction in the name of construction. The nexus between the ruling party president of the Bogra district, District Commissioner of Bogra and Upazila Nirbahi Officer (UNO) of Shibganj upazila was covert. The nexus of the local elites and Bureaucrats inhibited the implementation of the high court rule.

Another Karmasrijan project by the UNO started ransacking another satellite mound – Nitai Dhapanir Pat for the construction of a road. The grass root level government officials and several local journalists acted promptly again. The same High Court bench again summoned five persons including two local ruling party men on 2 February 2011. The bench again ruled for the construction of a ten member inquiry committee and asked the ministry and local administration for their failure in the protection. Unfortunately, most of the members are either bureaucrats or intellectuals with no background in grass root level archaeological reality and heritage studies.

Latest ruling of the High Court followed the newspaper reports of the re-commencing the construction activities during night. The District Commissioner, Police Super and The chairman of the Mazar Development Committee have been summoned to the court for their failure in following previous High Court ruling. The bench has also asked the ministry to find the possibility of removing the mosque associated with the mazar considering religious sentiments. Meanwhile, reliable sources disclosed several acts of  threatening and harassment of the grass root level government, Department of Archaeology officials and journalists by the District
Commissioner and UNO. They and their families are living under constant fear of physical attacks.

Interestingly, the urban elite perception about the destruction of archaeological material and cultural heritage in Bangladesh uncritically take the ‘illiterate’, ‘ignorant’ and ‘poor’ mass as the main agents of the destruction of the cultural heritage. In contrast to this urban middle class perception, this series of events pertaining to the demolition of the rich and unique cultural heritage of an extremely important site as Mahasthangarh overtly illustrates that the main agents and culprits are educated, conscious and powerful elite groups. This is true to many other cases of destruction of cultural heritage in Bangladesh. This is a case of educated destruction of cultural patrimony of Bangladesh.

We call for immediate action to stop these educated peoples:

We demand immediate punishment of the District Commissioner, Police Super and Bogra district Awami Leage President for violating the constitution, failure in upholding the High Court ruling and for complete negligence and sheer audacity they have shown by crossing the limits of the jurisprudence.

We demand a judicial inquiry into the entire affair.

We demand that all the reports by the previous inquiry committee should be made public and placed before the High Court.

Finally, we demand the security of the grass root level government officials and journalists who are continuously living with fear and terror by the educated powerful sections related to the state apparatus.

13 Bachelors’ Quarter; Jahangirnagar University

Swadhin Sen Archaeologist – Assistant Professor   Dept.of Archaeology
swadhin_sen@yahoo.com; swadhinsen@hotmail.com www.juniv.edu

This article has been edited for space and style.

No Comments yet »

Procuring books in Indian libraries

Posted in Archives by admin
Feb 04 2011
TrackBack Address.

Campaign to legalise parallel imports gathers steam.

In a move to advocate the cause of libraries and book readers throughout India, campaigners are telling Kapil Sibal, the Minister of Human Resources Development (HRD), why it is important to legalise parallel imports in India. This move is supported by the International Federation of Library Associations in developing countries.

Among the proposed amendments to the Copyright Act is a proposal to legalise parallel importation of books into India. This provision is now under threat because a publishers’ association convinced the HRD Minister (who is in charge of copyright law) that no one is calling for parallel importation. If parallel importing is not legalised in developing countries, it becomes impossible for libraries in India to even procure books from Amazon (for instance), especially the ones which have not yet released in India.

Parallel importation allows books that are (legally) bought overseas to be imported into India without asking the copyright owners permission. Without parallel importation being allowed, purchases made by libraries from foreign sellers (for instance on the Internet) are rendered illegal. International organisations like the International Federation of Library Associations (IFLA), Electronic Information for Libraries (eIFL), and Consumers International all support parallel importation, especially in developing countries.

For more on the need for parallel importation, see this write up by Pranesh Prakash from the Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore http://goo.gl/7MiMf.

For the campaign letter sent to Kapil Sibal by February 1st 2011, click here.

To
Minister for Human Resource Development
Room No 301
Shastri Bhawan
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road
New Delhi – 110 001

Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Dear Shri Sibal,
Subject: Parallel Importation of Books

We write to you as an organisation interested in the availability of books for libraries.  Recently, a publishers’ association has made public statements that there are no groups that are demanding parallel importation, and that they themselves will be harmed by allowing for parallel importation.

We wish to inform you that this is not true.  We believe that being able to legally purchase a book outside of India and import in into India is crucial for libraries.  Many books that we wish to provide for our users—faculties, students, and others—are not available in India and have to be imported from abroad.

Currently the exception contained in s.51(b) proviso is applicable only to individuals for “private and domestic use” and does not cover libraries.  Thus, if parallel importation is prohibited, then we will be unable to buy foreign books directly from foreign sellers.  We often have to make purchases on online bookstores such as Amazon and Alibris, and these will be construed to be illegal without parallel importation being legal.  We will be left at the mercy of what books are offered by sellers in India, instead of being able to buy what is required by our readers.

Parallel importation is allowed by the TRIPS agreement (Article 6, “Exhaustion”)  as well as by the WIPO Copyright treaty (Article 6, “Right of Distribution”).  We hope you will keep our concerns in mind.

Yours sincerely,
[Name]

For more information:
Centre for Internet and Society, Bangalore
http://www.cis-india.org/

No Comments yet »

Search past posts

Recent Posts

  • Mirza and Masculinity
  • Diary of a disastrous campaign
  • Singing of Love in LUMS
  • The Afterlife of Birds
  • Recall, recollect, reflect

Categories

  • Archives  (27)
  • Elsewhere  (21)
  • Gandharva  (2)
  • Love Legends  (8)
  • Uncategorized  (7)

Archives

  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • October 2010
  • September 2010

Our Partners

  • Film Southasia Film Southasia Film Southasia
  • Himal Southasian Himal Southasian Himal Southasian
  • Hri Institute Hri Southasian Hri Southasian
Powered by WordPress | “Blend” from Spectacu.la WP Themes Club